The American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) just did a survey on age discrimination. It was found that 61% of older persons are either suffering age discrimination or have been victims in the past. This means that 3 out of every 5 older persons are denied of the right to work.
If you have suffered age discrimination in the workplace, you should know that the law entitles you to seek remedy. You can hold your employer to account and get compensation for any damage you have suffered or advantages lost due to the discrimination.
The myth that older individuals are less valuable in the workplace is one that has been around for a while. Regrettably, it results in the denial of fair employment opportunities to hundreds of thousands of competent men and women. Simply because they are considered older.
This is wrong, as far as California and federal law are concerned. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) was specifically enacted to restrict employers from discriminating against older people on account of their age. California's Fair Employment and Housing Act also prevents age discrimination for employees who are 40 and older.
Our primary goal is to help assure that you recognize your rights. We also work to safeguard those rights by fighting aggressively on your behalf. If you suspect that you have been discriminated against on account of your age, contact our age discrimination lawyers today.
Signs of age discrimination may not always be recognizable. Usually, employers would prefer not to let on that they are being discriminatory. They will often disguise their actions under the guise of lawful employment actions.
But there are many signs you can look out for. Some of the most common indications that you are being victim of age discrimination include:
Proof of age discrimination may be with regard to disparate treatment or disparate impact. Disparate treatment occurs when an employee is singled out or specifically targeted because of their age.
Disparate impact is when an employer introduces a guideline that affects some employees differently. The policy often applies to all employees but has a significant negative impact on employees aged 40 and above. Certain factors must be proven to show that disparate treatment has indeed occurred. These include proof by the employee that:
She was 40 or older at the time of the act alleged discriminatory act;
The decision imposes a higher standard of proof for age discrimination. Before this decision, what was required was proof that the reason for the adverse action was mixed in with age discrimination.
The employee must also show that she was targeted for discrimination because of her age. The US Supreme Court took this position in Gross v. FBL 557 U.S. 167 (2009) where it stated that employees must show that age discrimination was the motivating factor behind the action.
She is qualified for the position/job.
She has experienced an adverse employment action. This may be a demotion, loss of employment privileges, changes of terms of employment etc
. The alleged adverse action arose under facts from which discrimination may be inferred.
Disparate impact can be shown by showing that the employer's guideline or employment practice is unequal in impact. Or that it has a disproportionately unwanted impact on the older members of the workforce.
Stray remarks are generally discriminatory comments that are made in passing. It is called a stray remark because it does not have to be made at the time an adverse discriminatory employment decision was taken.
However, in Reid v. Google, Inc., 155 Cal. App. 4th 1342 (2007 ), the California Court of Appeals stated that stray remarks may be used to weigh other evidence in the trial. This is in line with FEHA which states that the courts should interpret the laws forbiding age discrimination "broadly and vigorously".
American courts have commonly ruled against plaintiffs who have sought to rely on stray remarks (Sandell v. Taylor-Listug, Inc. (2010) 188 CA4th 297, 320, 115).
This is because stray remarks, without more, only lend an inference of discrimination. To show age discrimination, there must be further evidence such as statistics or a history of discriminatory conduct by the employer.
Our employment and age discrimination attorneys are committed to fighting aggressively for you.
You are entitled to this protection even if you were not the one that filed the complaint. If you testified on behalf of another employee or aided in a hearing, the law also prohibits your employer from retaliating against you.
We can help you.
No. You can not be terminated for filing an age discrimination complaint. FEHA and the ADEA specifically forbid employers from retaliating against employees that speak up against discriminatory practices.
If your employer is threatening to or has terminated you for filing an age discrimination complaint, you have a right to redress. The law allows you to sue your employer and recuperate adequate compensation for the injustice done to you
If you have been experiencing age discrimination in your workplace, you need not wait until your employment has been terminated before you seek appropriate remedy.
If you feel you may have a case, we can discuss your case in a safe and confidential environment. Please call us or contact us online to schedule a free case evaluation.
All Rights Reserved | Apex Legal Media | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement | Disclaimer